In the article “Speaking to Generation Nexus”, the Washington Post recently reported on business coach Anne Loehr, who teaches a class called “Get Wise With Gen Ys: How to Effectively Sell to Each Generation in Today’s Workplace.”
From the article (quoting Loehr) :
“[Millenials] really value making a difference. If you can say you are ‘green,’ or politically correct or socially correct, whatever, that goes a long way with them. Nike, no way. Gen Y will not buy Nike — that big, ugly globalized company. This generation is very well-educated — both parents probably have MBAs…Y’s may be working in the local schools, teaching French to the poor elementary school kids. Okay? That kind of thing.”
In case you wanted some crib notes on how to lump generations made up of the entire spectrum of ethinicities, classes, educational levels, etc., you can download “Anne Loehr’s Generational Cheat Sheet” from the Washington Post’s website.
This is, to say the very least, an incredible oversimplification. Loehr mistakes an entire generation’s proclivity towards optimism and “other-orientation” and reduces it to a fashion statement. Not only is this dangerously cynical and stereotypical, but overreaches into the political/personal and socio-economic realities that this generation grew up with.
By making this kind of generalization about a group born over the course of a decade is exactly counter to the multi-faceted nature of the generation. There is a shared consciousness of global events that did shape the American Millennial generation’s experience. Rapid advances in technology sectors during the ‘90s — with cell phones, the Internet and personal computers, satellite and cable television — did exponentially increase entertainment and information outlets for *everyone*; Millennials are just more adjusted and comfortable in that environment.